Existential Angst, part one
Posted by lpearle on 12 December 2016
For years librarians have planned lessons around digital literacy, hoping to teach students how to evaluate resources they find online. We share sites like Facts About Dioxygen Monoxide, All About Explorers and the Tree Octopus (and my personal fave, The Pomegranate Phone). We caution them that just because it’s online, or in a database, they need to use the CRAP test before using the information for research. And they get pretty good at that stuff.
But then, this past election. All that training, all those lessons – gone. Vanished. Ignored. And not just by our students.
Far too often professional friends passed along articles from organizations that appear on this now-infamous list of fake news organizations. Why? Because confirmation bias. Because echo chamber. Because it’s so easy to click and share, not check sources.
Last week they showed Screenagers to our Middle School, and we created a Resource Guide on Digital Citizenship. But how frequently do those parents, so concerned about the digital lives of their children also pass along these types of stories? The ones where [someone] destroys [rival]? The ones where candidates, past and present, allow surrogates to smear and spread semi-truths? The ones with easy-to-agree-with memes or “share if you agree” links?
Several times I recommended that these professional librarians check their source (ditto personal friends, many of whom read a headline and ignore the actual content – clickbait at its worst). Some did, some argued. But what gives me angst is how we can consider ourselves “experts” when we are guilty of just the same things we try to impress on students are “don’t dos”?
If you’ve done this sort of sharing over the past few months, how are you planning to change? or aren’t you? And if not, why not?